wombat_socho (wombat_socho) wrote,

  • Mood:
  • Music:

The Apollo program and other disappointments

Jerry Pournelle comments briefly on Google Chrome, which he correctly sees as the third try for network computing. He further notes (in his column) that less than 30% of the US has access to broadband. Add the two together, and it says to both of us that much like the paperless office, we're not in the future yet where network computing actually works well enough to risk your business on it.

And until you can convince America's businesses that network computing is safe and secure, they're not going to sign up for the program, because having nice cheap workstations isn't even half the battle. Take a bank, for example. Are you going to go ahead and put the personal and financial information of thousands, maybe millions of customers out there on the Internet, on servers you don't own and can't guarantee the security on? Oh, sure, Google might promise you those servers are secure, but if somebody cracks in and hoovers up all that data, your customers' lawyers aren't going to sue Google. They're going to sue YOU, and at that point you can kiss your job (along with your freedom, quite possibly) goodbye. We haven't even addressed the issue of a server crash denying you access to data or wiping out that data. Nope. It's just simpler and easier to keep all that stuff in-house, where you can run tape backups every day to make sure that if the worst case happens, you can restore the data and boot up tomorrow, good as new.

I recall that Wells screwed around with the Compaq iPaq for a bit while I was there, and finally tossed them in favor of more conventional Evo workstations. Aside from Compaq's fondness for proprietary hardware, I think what killed the iPaq for Wells was the plain and simple fact that it was just easier and cheaper to buy a hundred thousand conventional workstations that could function without network connectivity in all our far-flung branches, insurance offices, etc., rather than split up the purchase to get a bunch of iPaqs that would work fine within the regional headquarters in Minneapolis where you were hooked into the corporate network 24x7 but not so much in the hills and prairies of the Dakotas, Nebraska, etc., because once you got a few miles outside of Fargo, you're still talking dial-up connections.

Jerry also comments on this article by John Derbyshire about the Apollo program. He has some interesting things to say about the program, and I agree: we should have done it Delos D. Harriman's way, taking a step farther out until going to the Moon was just another step from our L4 and L5 stations. Instead, it got tangled up with the Cold War and national pride, and we did it in one mighty rush. RTWT.

UPDATE AND BUMP: Megan McArdle also has some thoughts on the Apollo landing's anniversary.
Tags: tech stuff
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.