Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry


I see that it's supposed to open tomorrow, and that some critics are hailing it as the new Full Metal Jacket. This may be more true than the critics know, but not for the reasons they think. FMJ was without question an antiwar movie, and it seems from the buzz that Jarhead was intended the same way...but people find their own uses for things. That's true for movies as well, and in the case of FMJ the characters Hollywood intended to show us as being wrong, evil and/or twisted wound up being adopted as icons instead. If I had a nickel for every grunt I knew who scrawled "Born to Kill" and a peace sign on their helmet liner in imitation of Animal Mother and Joker, I wouldn't sweat my retirement because I'd already have my million in the bank. In the same way, you'll find thousands of soldiers and Marines imitating Gunny Hartman.

So...Jarhead's going to do okay at the box office and get ranked on for all its faults (starting with the Kanye West theme song) and a lot of guys are going to wind up quoting Gyllenhaal and Foxx. Twenty years from now nobody will remember that it was an antiwar film but the film geeks.


( 4 comments — Leave a comment )
Nov. 4th, 2005 01:20 pm (UTC)
The Strib review says it's slow and boring, but to was The Thin Red Line and I loved that.
Nov. 4th, 2005 04:48 pm (UTC)
Oh, well, if the Strib says it sucks, then I HAVE to go see it. That guideline hasn't steered me wrong since I lived in DC and the Post reviewer called The Lords of Discipline racist. ^_^
Nov. 4th, 2005 10:48 pm (UTC)
Well, it depends on the reviewer - Stricker is a shithead, but Colin Covert is pretty damn good.
Nov. 4th, 2005 11:48 pm (UTC)
You could be right. I don't read the Strib often enough any more to draw the distinction...as far as I'm concerned, it's still suffering from a bad case of New York Times wannabee.
( 4 comments — Leave a comment )