?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Libertarians and the Democratic Party

Ann Althouse posted a couple days back about Kos' complaint that the single-issue groups have strangled the Democratic Party, which needs to replace those pressure groups with a central organizing principle. She also quotes from Howard Dean on the issue, and I think it's worth noting that both Koulitsas and Dean both are complaining about NARAL and how the GOP has forced the Democrats into the arms of the abortion lobby.

I think a lot of this is political wankage, myself. There are already libertarians in the Democratic party, just as there are in the GOP, because just like any other American political movement there are thousands and thousands of people who don't follow the party line precisely the way it's defined by observers. As a case in point, I would say that a lot of local fans who voted against W last year were "soft" libertarians who were more concerned about privacy issues and social equity issues, as opposed to "hard" libertarians whose main concern was making sure the War on Terror was prosecuted by somebody they could trust to throw down hardcore. Doctrinaire Libertarians (note the shift to a capital "L") of course voted for neither Bush nor Kerry, and saw their candidate doomed to indecent obscurity as usual.

Structurally speaking, I don't think Kos is going to get his wish until the Democrats hit rock bottom and have lost all but the hard-core socialists, at which point there might just be enough libertarians to take over the party if they're sufficiently disenchanted with the GOP. I think this would require a lot of the "hards" to switch parties, and I don't see that happening until the war with Iraq and/or the occupation of Afghanistan are wrapped up. Of course, if we have to crush the Syrians or some other obnoxious throwbacks (my money's on Venezuela) all this will change, but politics is like that. Right now the "hards" seem to be okay with what's happening in the GWoT, if perhaps unhappy that the administration is wobbly on such things as immigration -especially from Mexico- and making DHS run like a proper national security agency instead of a bunch of bureaucratic paper-passers.

I also don't think much of the much-touted conservative crackup that splits the party between the Christian conservatives and the "hard" libertarians. Nobody in either camp is all that happy with W's domestic agenda or the Congress at the moment, since neither side has gotten much of what they wanted due to the President being mainly concerned with the war and not so much with things like the porktransportation bill or stem cells or even Social Security. Hopefully things will reach a point in the war where the President can concentrate on some of these things and make the Ownership Society something that's really happening, but right now there's a war on, and we're trying to run it on the cheap. Which doesn't leave a lot of time for the domestic agenda.

Comments

( 2 comments — Leave a comment )
edminster
May. 24th, 2005 11:12 pm (UTC)
I may have thrown my vote away
But at least I voted. That counts for something, right?










...right?
wombat_socho
May. 25th, 2005 01:17 am (UTC)
Re: I may have thrown my vote away
I guess that depends on your definition of throwing your vote away. Did you choose not to vote in the down-ballot elections and just vote for a third party Presidential candidate? Then probably so. Otherwise, no. That's my take on it, anyway. I think if you paid attention to the issues and thought about your choices first you were light-years ahead of a lot of folks.
( 2 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

wombat
wombat_socho
wombat_socho

Latest Month

January 2019
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner